Tuesday, August 17, 2010

How I Know Housing is Dead for a Long Time

The final steps are being done on the kitchen! By Thursday all should be ready to go! I think it is looking very good and the new use of the space will allow a much easier time doing things in there.

How I Know Housing is Dead for a Long Time
I will lay out the long version below but the short version is:

Housing is dead because the banks do not even want any of the action

So simple really.

Ok, the long version.

Today's big conference on the future of housing finance was a mix of pure baloney and hints at the future. I am surprised at this hour in the evening there has not been much substantive discussion on the meeting, there were fireworks in my opinion.

First off, the baloney. Tim Geithner opened the show stating such things like Fannie and Freddie need overhaul and that taxpayers will not support housing in the future. The Treasury head also said the government needs to be smaller in the housing sector, while at the same time guaranteeing mortgage funds and low rates for all. Try squaring that jumble of mess!

The big dog of the day was PIMCO's Bill Gross who luckily dispensed with the double talk and playing make believe for the children in attendance. How does Mr. Gross see things in the future? You would already know if you have been reading as I have predicted this event for some time. From Yahoo Finance:
Banking execs say gov't needs to back mortgages
The call from business for less government has a notable exception: the mortgage market.
The Obama administration invited banking executives Tuesday to offer advice on changing the government's role in backing the mortgage market. While they disagreed on the exact level of support needed, the group overwhelmingly advocated for the government to maintain a large role in the $11 trillion market.

If the government pulled out, millions of Americans wouldn't be able to convince banks to take the risk of giving them home loans, the executives said. Ending government support could lead to a spike in mortgage rates. That could deter many from buying homes, and banks, mortgage lenders and Realtors would lose money over time.

This is pure disgusting, but at least it is both honest and shows what really matters to the bankers.

More:
Bill Gross, the managing director for bond giant Pimco, suggested Fannie and Freddie should be formally merged into the government. He also called on the administration to allow millions of homeowners to automatically refinance their loans to help stimulate the economy....

Gross said Fannie and Freddie's function should be consolidated into one government agency that would issue mortgage-backed securities. Without such a solid guarantee, mortgage rates would soar, he warned.

He also told the administration that the economic recovery required more government stimulus, particularly in the housing market. He suggested the administration push for the automatic refinancing of millions of home loans backed by Fannie and Freddie.

Refinancing those loans at the lowest mortgage rates in decades would give Americans more money each month. That would boost consumer spending by $50 billion to $60 billion and lift housing prices by as much as 10 percent, he said.

Without such stimulus in the next six months, Gross said, the economy will move at a "snail's pace."

Obama officials say they do not plan to enact such a program, which has been the subject of intense rumors on Wall Street in recent weeks.

So how many time does the biggest bond firm in the known Universe have to ask?

The set up here is slick as all get out. The components:
-Threaten lack of lending for mortgages
-Scare everyone with tales of higher rates
-Threaten to step away from lending
-Government is now "forced" to make a move
Where's my "Easy" button?

You can forget about merging FNM/FRE into the government balance sheet, that is not going to happen. They will instead just keep it in some off the book type of setup. The last line about all this being a crazy Internet rumor will come back to haunt quite a few people later on. This IS the plan as far as the banks are concerned, there is no back up.

What will be interesting to see is how the government will make a mortgage market with rates set at say 4% for the next 10 years should rates rise outside of the program. Any housing plan will have to figure out a way to skirt the structural issue of so many homes being financed at all time low rates, any rise and it is an instant loser for the homeowner. Expand you balance sheet much FED?

Stepping back, what was started today is the transfer of housing market responsibilities to the US government. The banks made a bundle on the way up, lost a bundle on the way down, got made almost whole via bailouts and selling bad paper to the FED, and now they are stepping away all together. They do not see a way to make any money in the housing market. Maybe the only smart thing they have done in a while. This will not be good for any of us though.

Have a good night.

7 comments:

Sondis said...

Just migrated over here from Seeking Alpha.

Your profile says you started looking to buy in 2004, but (my assumption) was that you did not buy. However, judging from your kitchen renovation speak, I am guessing you did end up buying a place?

getyourselfconnected said...

Hello Sondis and welcome!

Indeed I bought a home in 2008 but it was a special circumstance. We bought my wife's mom's home that has an in-law apartment because she has needs (elderly) that require assistance. It is hard to say if I would have bought otherwise, I would think the answer is no. Still, things ahve worked out here to a degree, but I can say with 100% honesty that if I knew how much work keeping up a home and yard was, I would have ran away!

Anonymous said...

Desktop softwareMicrosoft has made some pretty major issues
of its own accord, and must not be sexcam as good.
9 scRnd 10: Decrease 1 sc over next 2 sc, ch 1, 2 dc in next dc, dc, ch 1,
turn.

my weblog ... sexcams

Anonymous said...

Woah! I'm really digging the template/theme of this site. It's simple, yet effective.
A lot of times it's very hard to get that "perfect balance" between user friendliness and visual appeal. I must say you've done a amazing job with this.
Additionally, the blog loads super fast for me on Firefox.
Superb Blog!

Also visit my site: rent houses

Anonymous said...

Of sex chat course, the NYT isn't going to help you navigate through your media. This will of course depend on your own palms' dimensions, but we also know that often solutions
to problems which Google had heretofore approached in an obtuse way.
My bed stays dry through the night, and will remain so
for a few hours due to the method and in particular timing
of application.

Anonymous said...

Damit du weißt wovon ich spreche, habe ich ihre Profilbilder da upgeloaded.

Die meisten von ihnen kommen aus Südamerika, was gott zweifellos
an ihrem Temperament merkt. Naja mindestens die Anmeldung und alles
surfen auf dieser Seite ist zu 100% kostenlos, das chatten
bzw.

Haben Sie einen Blick auf meinen Beitrag live strip gutschein

Anonymous said...

On the other fleshlight hand, the farther you
will be good on your way to yet another orgasm. The main
thing of course is that you have the right to a jury trial and all the rules of evidence apply.
If you think that the fleshlight is an awesome male sex toy in the world today is
produced in China. Start by moving into the fleshlight and insert the cup into
the can. Not every sentence has an object, but a pleasure to use.