Showing posts with label Gold Bubble Debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gold Bubble Debate. Show all posts

Thursday, June 10, 2010

If at First You Don't Succeed, Try, Try Again!

Ok, I should have some real time to post tonight so you are warned ahead of time! Non stop rain today and we had to put the heat back on. Summertime does not come easy up here.

Do not forget to get your requests in for Friday night.

How Many US Dollars are Out There?
While most mainstream writers focus on the "seen" types of money, there is and will always be an enormous underground where the US dollar is the big time king. I saw this story over at Clusterstock today and the pictures were amazing. Short recap:
This plush villa, seized by the Mexican government, has it all: lions, gold-plated handguns, millions of dollars shoved in closets, and a killer underground hot tub. A handful of photos were posted to Activeboard.com, some originating from pictures that the Mexican government took.
Sure, it was purchased with drug money, but you have to check out some of these amenities.
Here is but one of the pictures of the loot:

This put me in mind of a little factoid I wrote on a while back:
Interesting Currency Fact
Earlier this week I was paging through the marked pages of a book I read a while back titled "Gold: The once and future money" by Nathan Lewis. Now this is not going to be a gold post, I got tons of comments over at Seeking Alpha for the blurb I posted last night.

I had marked this section for further thought:
A staff member of the IMF estimated that as little as 10-15% of all the US Currency held outside of banks is used inside the United States. The rest is being used outside the country--by foreign central banks, in dollarized countries, by travelers, smugglers, drug cartels, tax evaders, and foreign commercial banks--as the international currency of the world. Roughly two thirds of all the dollars in the world are in the form of $100 bills, a denomination almost never seen in the United States.
I would wonder just how much money is out there but there is just no way to know. And I do not mean just the smugglers, well, the drug sort anyway not the government types!

Desperate Debt Wives?
Kid Dynamite covered a really weird story about Japanese advertising that uses women to entice men to buy Japan government debt. I kid you not!:
From Bloomberg:
"Japanese women are seeking men who invest in government bonds, according to an advertisement being run by the Ministry of Finance.
“I want my future husband to be diligent about money,” a 27-year-old woman says in an ad being run in free magazines promoting a fixed-rate, three-year note that Japan started selling last week. “Playboys are no good.” She’s one of five women featured in the page, which says “Men who hold JGBs are popular with women!!”"
The ministry commissioned the ads to appeal to citizens for money at a time when record government borrowing threatens to outstrip demand. Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who took office yesterday, said he doesn’t have an instant fix to rein in the world’s largest public debt."
Great stuff...
This is really strange. What will this do to sales of sportscars should people believe chicks like debt? In the comments section I just could not help myself:
getyourselfconnected said...
Extenzee and Pretenzee! Makes your debt even bigger in two weeks or your deflated principal back!
Ok, I am childish, but it has it finer points!

If at First You Don't Succeed, Try, Try Again!
I think the next stage of the financial debacle is taking shape and future policy at this point should be clear. There will be plenty of fake hand wringing as well as some debate (such that headlines can be called debate) about what to do but now I have zero doubt what is coming down the line.

Get ready for another round of funny money to be thrown at the economy in hopes more is better.

Why? I could go over plenty of reasons, but we have covered them all for a while:
-Housing IS going back down
-The stock market rally (on which the entire "recovery" was wrapped around) has suffered major damage and the swings as of late for no reason other than "fat fingers" has the average guy heading for the door
-Job markets are no longer shedding jobs at an alarming rate, but still no significant job creation (and no, even 100,000 real jobs next month is not significant viewed against the unemployment backdrop so don't bother)
-Via Ilargi at The Automatic Earth here is another angle I had missed entirely:
-BP [..] accounts for 12-13 percent of dividend payouts in Britain. Pension funds and other investors are heavily reliant on it.
-BP [..] accounts for 12-13 percent of dividend payouts in Britain. Pension funds and other investors are heavily reliant on it.
That should put you right in line with what will be playing out now. BP's bankruptcy looks like a foregone conclusion. That is, unless the US and UK governments step in, and do so broadly and very loudly. With both money and legal changes. The former, because BP faces far more in lawsuits and damage claims than it has in liquidity (its shares are now worth less than its assets, always an alarming sign). The latter, well, for more or less the same reason.

One party you don’t want to be when BP's bankruptcy lands square squash on the table is a Louisiana fisherman or a Florida tourist operator. British pensioners first!
While BP is a bigger concern for British pensions, how many US pensions are stuffed to the gills with now worthless FNM stock? Another hand looking for an out.

Forget the particular issues that will require more "liquidity" to make better, there are too many anyway. Let's take a look at the thought process going on amongst the very types to be crafting future policy.

Robert Reich, who seems to have a good head on his shoulders when it comes to handling the big banks, still is mired in the spend no matter what mantra. In this post he offers two things an economic advisor could tell the president:
-Spend more and hope
-Don't and pray
Well it is more nuanced than that, but that's what it is. Guess which way he thinks we should go?

As predicted by many, Paul Krugman is already moaning that the last round of stimulus/bailouts/whatever was too small to matter and now it is time for more. Next time this time will have been too small as well, but we will have to wait to skewer him then. Mish points out very well that we DID HAVE a lost decade already and Krugman is worried about the next one? It never ends. Here you go from Mish:
Kiss the Illusion Goodbye
With global stimulus efforts playing second fiddle to default concerns, a double-dip recession is just around the corner. Please see Hungary Tries To Calm Markets; Europe Headed Back in Recession, US Will Not Decouple for further discussion.
The Keynesian clowns will be howling that reduced stimulus killed the recovery. However, the reality is there was no recovery in the first place, only an illusion caused by unsustainable stimulus.


Yves Smith is even on board for accelerator depression by the government and uses this section as an analogy:
Similarly, the fear about rising deficits is misplaced right now. As George Soros pointed out in a speech today in Vienna, the action of righting an economy when it faces serious financial stresses is a lot like straightening out a car that has gone into a skid: you need to turn the wheels into the skid, which looks like taking it further off the track where you want it to go, until it regains traction and you can then steer it back to its proper path. In this case, we need an expansion of public debt to offset the needed contraction in private sector debt, and then to (Soros did point out that this was a tricky operation). Otherwise, a resumption of the crisis is in the cards.
I offered in the comments section:
While the Soros driving metaphor is not bad, I would ask what good is regaining a sliding car when you are doing donuts in a parking lot 10 miles from the freeway when you need to be on the freeway.
“Replace Private Spending with Government Spending” sounds good but it does not answer was there too much spending in the first place?
This is the kind of crisis mode deal stop gap measures that impede any long term progress.
I like that one! Donuts in the parking lot, HA!

Putting it all together, there is going to be another round of stimulus/loan guarantees/unemployment extension to 2015/tax credits for various things/etc. I think the summer will be all about "laying the groundwork" and then the fall will bring the noise. Right before the mid term elections. This is dangerous politically because you have to hope more people will like handouts and vote for you than people will hate wasting money and vote against you. Money handed out tends to get the handee voters to go to the polls though.

I wanted to talk about a bubble which has not garnered much attention. It seems bubbles are everywhere today and in everything. I will lay out the most dangerous one.

The creation of 3 Trillion, 5 Trillion, or 13 trillion (depending on how you count) of new money has not resulted in inflation nor a bond market dislocation. In fact, it seems as if you can make all the money you want and bond yields go DOWN! Inflation goes almost NEGATIVE! It is truly amazing. What this has done is make a bubble in the egos of the Keynesian type money printers. I think they are feeling pretty confident right now even as they ignore the structural issues that have allowed this game to proceed. Why not double it? Triple it? Why not indeed.

Gold can serve as a foil bubble, a bubble nonetheless, but a counter balance to the madness of this mindset. Everyone wants to know how far gold can go to the upside? Ask instead how far the money printers can dream.

Have a good night.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Friday Night, Holiday in Sight

It was about 20 degrees here today at the warmest point. I stayed in all day and got caught up on all those little things that you never get to take care of. A few items and then on to the Friday festivities as the holiday's are in sight and it is time to relax and reflect on the year that was.

On the Hunt for A Home at Age 70
Caught this strange Q&A over at Mortgage Insider:
Judy in Laguna Woods asks:
Q. My husband and I need to buy a home before our two-year lease is up (in Laguna Woods) mid March 2010. He hasn’t owned a home in 10 years. I owned a home until my late husband passed away. At that time, I sold my home of 17 years in 2007. To get to the point, it has NOT been three years since I was a homeowner (August 2010 will be three years). We need both incomes to qualify. We are both 70 years old. If someone who owns a home now can “trade up,” and still get the home-buyer tax credit, doesn’t it seem like we are in a catch-22 position?! It is not like we are home flippers. Are there any exceptions to this new extension to the tax credit?
Two incomes and looking to buy at age 70? I guess it's true, you never can stop working.

Great Google Search Feature
The Mess that Greenspan Made has a great Google search map of the following terms:
-Housing Bubble
-Stock Bubble
-Gold Bubble
I cannot embed it here, so go check it out.
Seems gold has been thought to be in a bubble for a LONG time.

Piling on Citi
Last post I ran some numbers on Citi and their crazy outstanding share position. Bespoke Investment Group goes further:
4.22 Citi Shares For Each Person in the World
A comment on Zero Hedge today offered up an interesting stat -- that there are 4 shares of Citigroup for each person on the planet. Wow.

We looked at all US stocks and found that Citi has by far the most shares per person on the planet. With 28,260,770,000 shares outstanding and 6,692,030,277 people in the world in 2008, the Citi shares/person ratio is 4.22. There are only four other US stocks that have enough shares outstanding to give every person in the world at least one share -- General Electric (1.59 shares/person), Bank of America (1.48), Microsoft (1.33), and Pfizer (1.21). Bill Gates held 681,395,074 shares of MSFT in his last Form 4 filing. That's enough to give everyone in the world a tenth of a share of MSFT just from his holdings.
I do not even have 1 share of C!

Friday Night Entertainment
A little of this, a little of that, and then you have something!

Top 10 Films of the Decade
This is not my personal list, it was compiled by Gawker and here was their methodology:
So what we've done is added up all the Best lists we could find online — from the New Yorker to spitefulcritic.com; anywhere where people had made a list. We gave each film a point for every inclusion on every top ten list. Some lists made it a bit difficult, doing say an unordered top 15's, but we've included as much as we can to try and get an accurate count.
Seems reasonable enough. You can check the link for the full on list and descriptions or just the top 5 list below:
#1-12 Votes
There Will Be Blood

#2-11 Votes
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The Lord of the Rings films

#3-10 Votes
No Country For Old Men

#4-8 Votes
Momento

#5-7 Votes
Brokeback Mountain, The Dark Knight

Again, not my list. Discuss!

Funny Pictures
What better way to get your blog tons of hits from image searches than to include a bunch of LOL Cat captions? I also add some Fail Blog entries as well.

This looks like me on Sunday when the NFL is on and the wife wants me to do something:
funny pictures of cats with captions
see more Lolcats and funny pictures
Christmas Carol Kitties new lyrics:
funny pictures of cats with captions
see more Lolcats and funny pictures

A new site, Epic Win, has this to offer for us Star Wars fanatics:

Instant classic!

Who needs luck when the cards are fixed?:
fail owned pwned pictures
see more Epic Fails
Count em!

Do you think this place survived the housing bubble bust?:
fail owned pwned pictures
see more Epic Fails

Film Clip
In a film with too many moments of great cinema, enjoy one clip form "The Godfather":

"You straightened my Brother out?" Scary.

Rock Blogging
There were actually a few requests, I was shocked!

Anon wanted Elvis and "Blue Christmas" and here you get what you ask for (unless it's the Beatles):


Loyal reader Watchtower requested the Foo Fighters and "Hero":

Nice!

My favorite Def Leppard song is "Bringin' on the Heartbreak" and you absolutley must see this live performance (starts at 1:45 mark):


Complete with vintage 80's video, here is The Clash and "Rock the Casbah":


Last call!

Randy Rhoads was a real genius. One of his greatest triumphs was blending his classical guitar background with wicked metal crossover in the song "Diary of a Madman" with Ozzy. If you have never heard this song, do me a favor and listen to at least:
-the first 50 seconds
-the 2:00 minute mark through the 4:30 mark
-the last 30 seconds rock as well

True beauty.

Have a good night.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Over My Head Friday

I am not sure if it is my sinus congestion, the sudden cool down in the weather, or if financial stories got very complicated in one day but I feel a bit lost! I will offer up a few items that had me confused (what's new?) and then off to the Friday night usual fun. At least I get that part.

A Bubble in Gold Bubble Stories
Between this blog, Illusion of Prosperity, Bill Bonner of The Daily Reckoning, and a myriad of other sites the only thing I can say with 100% confidence is that there is a bubble in "Gold Bubble" stories! At this point I am firmly with Mr. Bonner when he says:
Too many ‘possibles.’ Too many things we know we don’t know. And too many things we don’t know we don’t know too. And too many things about which we have no clue. We’re tired of thinking about it.
Sounds about right!

I have a new poll question up for a vote: Where is gold on the bubble scale?

Deflation is a Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery Inside an Enigma
Thanks to Winston Churchill! Starting off the "dazed and confused" parade is the concept of deflation. Economic Disconnect wants to be honest and admit this animal is a hard one to fully appreciate. No wonder all governments aim for inflation, it just makes more sense!

We will begin with an expansive piece my Mish Shedlock. You will need a spare half an hour to really read the entire detailed post, but it is worth it.

Now you would think that after that great primer on deflation, all would be clear. I guess I am a slow learner!

As if I needed more help, one of my favorite writers anywhere is Mr. Practical (who posts on Minyanville infrequently). Today Mr. Practical weighs in on deflation and offers this juicy nugget:
In deflation, there’s too much debt. If the economy is slowing down, it makes it more difficult to pay back that debt and you would expect more to default. The more debt that forfeits, the more dollars are destroyed. The more dollars destroyed, the more they’re worth.

Now I understand this in principle. What I am having a real issue with is this idea applied to our "printing press" gunners at the FED. Thus far we have seen zero, count them zero, limits on the US ability to print as much money as we darn well please. If dollars are destroyed, just make more. To round this out, if deflation results in a stronger currency then:
-Would it not make sense to have rampant deflation for some time, allow the dollar to rise to some obscene number on the index, then use those extremely valuable dollars to buy the entire world?

How come nobody has thought of this before? I will take full credit for the original idea here!

All kidding aside, what are the limits to what I just outlined? At some point this all gets silly (if say $10 could buy Japan) so there must be something else I am missing. Where are the traps? Where does it hit a wall? I would really like some creative ideas in the comments on this one all.

Economists Love Bubbles
Maybe I am naive, and maybe I am just so nice on the inside that I would imagine an economist would strive to find sustainable growth, a stable currency, job creation, and maintenance of a standard of living to be ideal goals. I get a bit confused when they openly are looking for some kind of bubble to achieve their goals instead of long term solutions to problems.

Today's whopper comes from a recurring contributor to this award, Economist's View. My second favorite Keynesian (gaining ground on Krugman all the time though) Mark Thoma highlights a piece by Tim Duy and just goes right out and says what we all knew anyway; these guys are praying for another bubble. Short excerpt so I do not throw up:
So, given the unemployment outlook is sad, wage growth continues to deteriorate, core inflation is falling, and we seem to lack an institutional arrangement to force higher prices, should they even emerge, into higher wages, what is the Fed thinking? Should they really be worried about winding down programs? Are they really confident enough that an inventory correction that will undoubtedly spike GDP numbers will also translate into sustainable growth? Even knowing full while that after the last recession, the US economy languished despite the inventory correction, only to be revived on the back of the housing bubble? In effect, the Fed looks to be putting much weight on the cyclical story playing out, while ignoring the structural story of the necessity of asset bubbles to fuel growth.

Advice for the economists: start using your vast superior intelligence to SOLVE problems instead of inventing ways to MASK them and I will apologise for everything I ever said about your profession. I am serious. And don't call me Shirley.

Lost in the Ether
The two following tales are so over my head I am just going to provide the links and allow you the honor of wrapping yourself around the twisted path that MBS are looking at right now:
Mortgage Bonds: It's a Trap via Accrued Interest

PPIP Get's its Debut via Rortybomb

Good Luck!

Friday Night Entertainment
After that parade of confusion, lets move on to the easy stuff!

Gift for that Special Lady
What do you get that special lady in your life to say "Thanks for tolerating me?" Diamonds are to expensive. Coach bags MUST be matched to the lady perfectly and by this I mean she has to buy it or tell you exactly which one to get, and that's no surprise! Here is a suggestion, a teddy bear jacket:

I think this could be huge this Christmas. Story and ordering information via Geekologie.

Special Delivery
Economic Disconnect is in the market for a new kitty as you know, but I was shocked that Amazon has so much confidence in their 1 day shipping policy that they would chance this kind of package:
funny pictures of cats with captions
see more Lolcats and funny pictures
I am just KIDDING!

Film Clips
I am not sure anyone really checks this section out, but I get a kick out of it and it leaves my favorite clips someplace I can easily find them, so it goes on.

A film that not many people have seen is "The Prophecy". I love the film (NOTE: I am not religious, just love the film). Here are some clips of Christopher Walken playing Archangel Gabriel:


I love the film "The Outsiders". Take a look at the opening credits and see the that this cast became the heart of Hollywood for the next era:


Rock Blogging
Ending the night with the music!

My message to the markets, provided by Hall and Oates, is "Out of Touch":


I finally found out the name and artist of a song from the film Heat that I really liked. Enjoy New Order (featuring Moby) and "New Dawn Fades":

Nice!

I have had this one before, but the piano music ran into my head this week, so enjoy "Tubular Bells" made well known in the film "The Exorcist":


Last one, I am a bit out of steam!

Closing the show with another song from a movie! At least I am consistent!

I loved the film "At Close Range" with Sean Penn and the already mentioned Christopher Walken (was he in everything??). Madonna wrote this song for the film, so try out "Live to Tell" along with plenty of cool clips from the must see film:


Have a good night.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Wednesday FOMC Day

I got a sense there was more attention than usual to the FOMC announcement today. I have no idea why that would have been. I will try and make some sense of it all tonight.

Reason Number 1,245,678 to Vote Against Every Incumbent Everywhere: Hypocrisy
Back in time around late 2003 Massachusetts had a Republican Governor. There was a huge fear by the 92% democrat held state government that if John Kerry should beat George Bush for the Presidency, the governor would appoint a Republican senator to replace him. The state legislature immediately went out and over the course of 2 weeks changes the longstanding rule to allow for a special election to fill the seat.

The argument was that the will of of the people must be followed, not the whim of a partisan governor. Ok, I'll play. While I think changing an almost universal rule was an over reaction, I allowed that the argument that lack of representation until a special election better fits a state like ours. Fair enough.

Fast forward to today, 2009. Senator Kennedy has recently passed, and the special election is set for this late fall. But now of course, the ability of a democrat governor is impaired by the very rule the 92% majority forced through as law an this of course cannot stand. Again, in the space of two weeks the law has been changed to allow the governor to appoint a replacement on temporary basis, until the special election. And what happens should another republican win the top office? I think you can figure that out.

I point this out to highlight hypocrisy. I am sure the same games go on in heavily republican states with the same kind of intellectual dishonesty. What can you do? Easy, vote against every single incumbent come next election. That way at least you are sure to get new hypocrites.

The Bubble in Gold Debate
I really wanted to leave this one alone, but of course "Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in". My good friend over at Illusion of Prosperity wonders in last nights offering "Is There a Gold Bubble?" The author writes:
In my opinion, in order to justify gold's current price then inflation better show up at some point. Further, if inflation does show up there are probably better things to hoard than something that has already risen by a factor of four. Toilet paper continues to come to mind. Just a thought.

I know this isn't going to be popular with the gold bugs, but I just call it like I see it. I'm not saying gold is in a bubble, but I certainly have no interest in buying it (again) at these prices. There is serious risk at these levels and that is not something I look for in a "safe" store of value. Maybe that's just me.
My first thought is "it is far too hard to identify bubbles as they are forming, but better to try and mop up the mess after they have burst"...I am kidding! That was the FED's answer to the DotCom bust!

Because I know the author well I can guarantee he is not a gold hater by any means, he just sees better opportunities right now. Given the current market mess, I think anyone espousing putting all your eggs in one basket is asking for trouble as well.

My answer about a golden bubble was written on March 27th of this year. In a post titled "Will the Next Asset Bubble Please Stand Up?" I laid out the following criteria for a bubble to happen ( I hate to quote myself!):
To find that next great chance at a lottery winner, we must first describe some criteria that have to be met for the next bubble to really take off. Here are some qualities I think would be needed:
- Exciting (E): to foster attention and participation said bubble has to have an element of excitement. Junk bonds are so boring, you know?
- Leverage Access (L): for a bubble to really get going you need access to leverage to expand buying power above and beyond that which is directly available to the buyers.
- Believability (B): the next bubble needs a believable storyline, well at least a good story. We all know beanie babies are not going to cost 1 million dollars, but a condo in North Dakota? Maybe!
- Low Entry Threshold (T): the next bubble will not be in some kind of hedge fund that requires 100 million in assets to qualify for participation.
- Displayable Results (R): like YHOO stock rolling up 30% every month or a home going up in price 20% every 3 months, there has to be some way for the masses to show their awesome investment skills off to the world.

With an eye on this criteria, lets look at some possible candidates and score (1 lowest, 10 highest) them on each category.

I looked at Oil, Real Estate (again!)and Gold. On gold, here was my scoring:
Candidate 3: Gold
E score: 9
Gold is about as exciting as it gets. Shiny and never changing, gold gets the blood pumping
L score: 4
While ETF's can be bought on margin, real bullion sellers will not play loose with the leveraged buying only by all but the big boys.
B score: 9
If you think paper money the world over is backed by mostly nothing, gold sells itself. That gold has been money since the dawn of man is a solid tale.
T score: 3
A little gold is easy and cheap. Any real amount gets expensive, fast.
R score: 9
Gold prices run on most market tickers and eBay can always get you excited about how much you could auction your gold off at.
Total score: 34

In reference, Gold scored higher than Oil, but below a replay of Real Estate.

I think the leverage issue is a major one. The main point to take home is still how small an investment gold is for almost the entire US market.

Can gold be overpriced right now? Yes, it can. Can gold have much further to go to the upside? Of course. If gold is indeed a bubble, it was the slowest expanding bubble in history. We have yet to have the blow off top where taxi drivers are telling you to buy gold!

The debate is always fun, but as always a balanced portfolio with out all bets on one sector has always been my position. If you are of the end of the world bent, items other than gold will be far more useful. Scope out Survival Blog to understand just what the minimum would require.

Wednesday FOMC Day
The FED announced nothing earth shattering today. The only change was some language about some pick up in economic activity. The FED said they will extend MBS purchases out longer, but in smaller amounts. That was about it.

The market I think was front running some kind of expansion of both the treasury buying and MBS buying. The sell off after the news would back this up. I would caution the bears about getting excited here, by tomorrow the bulls will have a new story to rally around.

As far as the FED, they in no way hinted at any exit strategy, no matter what you will read across the media today. They all but bold typed the "we reserve the right" to expand these programs. In light of the dollar beating that has been going on, the FED should play for time before rolling out more market support, and that is all they did today. The end of October (treasury purchases) is still far off, and March of next year (MBS buys) may well be 2020 for how long that will seem in economic terms.

For all the economists out there that can summon cool charts and make awesome graphs I would offer you a homework assignment. Figure out how far "below capacity" the US economy would run at even historically "normal" interest rates. Try out a FED rate of even 2%, 3%, and all the way up to 5%. Still think a rate hike is coming before 2012? Run those numbers again.

Have a good night.